The credit default swap market survived the credit crunch of 2007 well but still they are considered as an important tool to managing credit risk. A financial institution can reduce its credit exposure to particular companies by buying protection. It can also use CDSs to diversify its credit risk. But now the question arises that how much fair this CDS game is???
In a very simple way this is a contract that provides insurance against the risk of default by particular company. There is one important difference between CDSs and other OTC derivatives that other OTC derivatives are depends on interest rate, exchange rates, equity indices, commodity prices and so on while on other hand CDS spread depends on the probability that the particular company will default on during a particular period of time. In case of other OTC derivatives there is no reason that one market participant will have more information that any other market participant while in case of CDS some market participants have more information to estimate this probability than others. Any financial institution which is involve in market advisory, consultancy, providing loans and funds, handling new issues of company is likely to have more information about credit worthiness of that particular company than other financial institutions those have nothing to do with that particular company. This whole phenomenon is known as asymmetric information problem.
Whether asymmetric information will curtail the expansion of credit default swap market is to be seen. Some financial institutions emphasizes that the decision of buying protection against the risk of default by the company is generally taken by risk management team of that particular team and it has nothing to do with any special distribution that may exist elsewhere in the financial institution about the company. Some market participants says that the growth of CDS market will continue and that it will be as big as the interest rate swap market by 2010.
